Andrew Alvarez: The Fight for Texas - A New Voice for the U.S. Senate

I am a staunch supporter of the Second Amendment. To me, the right to bear arms is not just a constitutional privilege but an essential safeguard of personal liberty and security. I believe that an armed citizenry acts as a deterrent against both tyranny and crime, ensuring that individuals retain the ability to protect themselves, their families, and their property. The framers of the Constitution understood the importance of this right, and I hold firm to the belief that it should not be infringed upon.

I am vehemently opposed to red flag laws because they undermine due process, one of the bedrock principles of our legal system. These laws allow for the seizure of firearms based on accusations or suspicions, often without the accused having the opportunity to confront their accuser or present a defense. This kind of legislation opens the door to abuse, where personal vendettas or misunderstandings could lead to the unjust disarmament of law-abiding citizens. I stand by the principle that any action taken against an individual should follow due process, ensuring that rights are not stripped away without fair and just legal proceedings.history of 2nd Amendment4th Amendment rightsadd personal anecdote

I am firmly against the excessive government spending we've seen, particularly with regard to the funding for Ukraine. As of now, the U.S. has allocated over $113 billion towards the war in Ukraine, a figure that I find staggering and unsustainable. This money could have been directed towards domestic issues that directly impact American lives, such as infrastructure, education, or healthcare. Instead, we're pouring resources into a conflict with no clear end in sight, neglecting our own citizens' needs in the process.

My concern with this level of expenditure isn't just about the numbers; it's about the principle. Every dollar spent on foreign conflicts like the one in Ukraine is a dollar not invested back into our own country. We're talking about a significant chunk of our budget, and I believe that this level of foreign aid, especially without stringent oversight, is irresponsible. It's time we prioritize our national interests and fiscal responsibility over funding endless conflicts abroad, which do not directly benefit the American taxpayer.

I am strongly in favor of robust border security because I believe it's essential for maintaining the safety, sovereignty, and integrity of our nation. The borders are not just lines on a map; they are the first line of defense against various threats, including criminals from all over the world who seek to exploit our openness. We've seen an influx of individuals from numerous countries, some of whom are known to have criminal backgrounds or affiliations with organized crime. This situation endangers our communities, increases the strain on our law enforcement, and undermines the rule of law.

Enhancing border security isn't about xenophobia; it's about common sense and protecting our citizens. We need comprehensive measures, including walls, advanced surveillance, and effective immigration enforcement to ensure that those who cross our borders do so legally and are properly vetted. The influx of criminals from not just neighboring countries but from around the globe highlights the urgency of this issue. We cannot afford to be lax when our national security, local safety, and economic well-being are at stake. It's time to secure our borders effectively, ensuring that America remains a safe and welcoming place for those who respect our laws.criminal vetting processesimmigration policy reformmore on local impact